There’s been rumor of porting KDE desktop to Windows. There seems to be some debate about this. Some would say that it’s damaging to Linux community because it keeps potential Linux users from adopting Linux. Some how this argument seems without much merit to me. I know that my adoption of Linux was eased by the familiarity of all my favorite application working identically in Windows. My migration was unusual at the time compared to a lot of my cohorts. I was using Open Office, GIMP, and Firefox. Most of them were using Microsoft Office, Photoshop, and IE. (Might point out, we were all a bit poor, so Office and PS where bootlegged.)
Having said all that. A bit on a rant nevertheless, I believe that KDE being ported to Windows signifies a bigger goal. The original goal of free software. Free software should be made to help and improve the life of everyone. The user, the programmer, and even the Windows user. If KDE somehow makes the daily tasks of most windows users easier, then we’ve done quite a wonderful thing. It shouldn’t always be about Linux adoption, it should be about choice.
Google does not care if your using Firefox, IE, Opera, or even Lynx. That’s why Google has dominated the internet. Google lets you have choices. It’s a recipe for success. Now I may be a Gnome geek, but KDE has a lot to offer the Windows world. Krita is a great example. It looks a lot like Photoshop. A familiar face. K3B could possibly totally replace Nero for a lot of users.
Well hopefully if this port does go without a hitch, it will make things easier for some of my friends. Anything that makes them bitch less, will make me feel better too.
